Please do not trust a word of what ChatGPT tells you. It’s worse than worthless.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Please do not trust a word of what ChatGPT tells you. It’s worse than worthless.
I’m willing to wait and see…
However, I’ve been following the Ed Martin 4Runner aftermarket TRD lift available and they do include an OEM beefed up cv axle, 5:50 mark:
I tried to locate the P/N but have not been able to nail them down.Hmm, I want to know the part number for those beffy axels.
And do those beefy axles have rzeppa or tripod inner joints?Hmm, I want to know the part number for those beffy axels.
Exactly my concern with upgraded axles - transferring that force to the diff. What piqued my interest was the additional travel they claim with the Tacoma CVs - any thoughts on that? I assume they aren’t substantially beefier, but maybe that’s a bad assumption.They still have the ICON lift installed, I saw it in person at Cruise Moab. As part of Fordyce destruction they broke the rear diff locker and had to replace that as well and bent the rear upper control arm brackets to boot.
This just shows upgrading the axles transfers the break point to the more expensive harder to trail fix parts.
Longfields are nice kit, but at $2500 a set to your door and making the diff the weak point I'll stick with OEM, same goes for portals but just much greater price and the unavoidable wheel poke induced by them, plus the additional required maintenance these are only realistic for a trail only rig for a dedicated serious off roader that sees allot of use each year IMO.
It’s a search engine that compressed 1.5 hours of forum searching into 2.5 minutes of overview. It actually did a good jobPlease do not trust a word of what ChatGPT tells you. It’s worse than worthless.
Rzeppa only the LC250 has the Tripod that I’m aware ofAnd do those beefy axles have rzeppa or tripod inner joints?
The only way they would provide additional travel would be if the stockers were at their travel limit and are the limiting factor in further down travel and if the difference in joint design allows more travel which it does, but this is not the case on a stock 250 or 3" and below lifted 250 as if it were we'd be seeing blown CVs all over the place, the shocks are still the limiting factor in down travel even with the extended length shocks I'm running. I'd also say diff drop is important if staying OEM and doing any suspension lift (if you offroad and reach suspension articulation limits regularly) as any increased angle on the CVs is putting them closer to their failure point.Exactly my concern with upgraded axles - transferring that force to the diff. What piqued my interest was the additional travel they claim with the Tacoma CVs - any thoughts on that? I assume they aren’t substantially beefier, but maybe that’s a bad assumption.
Thanks Bad, as always really appreciate the wealth of knowledge.The only way they would provide additional travel would be if the stockers were at their travel limit and are the limiting factor in further down travel and if the difference in joint design allows more travel which it does, but this is not the case on a stock 250 or 3" and below lifted 250 as if it were we'd be seeing blown CVs all over the place, the shocks are still the limiting factor in down travel even with the extended length shocks I'm running. I'd also say diff drop is important if staying OEM and doing any suspension lift (if you offroad and reach suspension articulation limits regularly) as any increased angle on the CVs is putting them closer to their failure point.
All that said the 250 uses inner Tripod and outer Rzeppa joints vs the 550/Tacoma/4R offroad trim use a double offset inner and Rzeppa outer which can handle greater articulation and will hold up to torque better than it's counterpart due to being further from its articulation limits or bind. Would be nice to know what the shaft diameters are between the two and whether or not the joint sizes are the same?
What you do likely get is a joint that is further from reaching articulation bind and therefore less likely break, if the axle shafts and joints are of the same size and material it really isn't going to be significantly stronger. Tripod joints of the same or slightly smaller size of a Rzeppa are stronger than Rzeppas but have less angular articulation, the Tripod joint allows lateral movement (plunge) were as a standard Rzeppa doesn't. The major drawback of the Tripod is it can be easily pulled out of its cup when at full suspension articulation and too much torque is applied to fast (slip to full traction). Rzeppa joints are much harder to seperate and won't reach bind at the same angle of the Tripod and the double action joint that replaces the Tripod is much less likely to seperate in the same situation the Tripod would.
I've rebuilt both types and the Tripods come apart easy, the Rzeppas are quite challenging to get apart and put back together and the spring clip is the weakest part of that joint style. Lots of vehicles have Rzeppas on the wheel side and Tripods on the diff/trans side. Funny thing is the My Tundra and 250 have The Tripod inners while our AWD Volvo uses a Double action inner Rzeppa!
I suspect Toyota chose the Tripod joint for the 250 and other platforms purely from an Economy standpoint as they have less rolling resistance and are cheaper to manufacture,
If one were to upgrade, the ideal upgrade IMO would be double action inners with the same outers with axle shafts of the same diameter and material as the Originals as this would eliminate the Tripod issue and not be so significantly stronger to be likely to transfer the damage to the diff. If Toyota would sell you just the inner joint with spring clip, boot and boot clamps that would be the ideal I'd think.
The opposite of my experience and I strongly disagree but I’m sorry your expectations haven’t been met. I’d encourage you to find a vehicle you don’t have to force yourself to like - perhaps a Rubicon is the vehicle for you.I think everyone needs to come to terms with the reality of the LC250 and the 4Runner and Tacoma for that matter which I have also owned both. Toyotas in general from my experience do not like to be built up. Their suspensions from factory are weak overall and it’s a slippery slope once you start making changes.
Personally I’ve been very disappointed in the new LC250 since I bought mine, and this is just my opinion. I know most or all of you are very pleased with it and that’s great; I wish I was. I’m trying to force myself to enjoy it more but so far it feels like I bought a 70k Corolla that can kind of go off road a little. Nothing about this vehicle is beefy, solidly built or robust. I have seen some videos of it doing well off-road but it will never be what many of us want it to be. It’s an already expensive vehicle that doesn’t justify another 10k in suspension parts to make it great. Dare I say just by a Rubicon and call it a day if that’s your desire.
No, just listen critically, research sources, and be sensitive to information that doesn’t seem to make sense. Same thing we should do with the internet in general and with people too.Please do not trust a word of what ChatGPT tells you. It’s worse than worthless.
Buy a rubicon and call it a deathwable/catch on fire/ replace engine @ 34k kind of day... sprinkled with rubber duckiesI think everyone needs to come to terms with the reality of the LC250 and the 4Runner and Tacoma for that matter which I have also owned both. Toyotas in general from my experience do not like to be built up. Their suspensions from factory are weak overall and it’s a slippery slope once you start making changes.
Personally I’ve been very disappointed in the new LC250 since I bought mine, and this is just my opinion. I know most or all of you are very pleased with it and that’s great; I wish I was. I’m trying to force myself to enjoy it more but so far it feels like I bought a 70k Corolla that can kind of go off road a little. Nothing about this vehicle is beefy, solidly built or robust. I have seen some videos of it doing well off-road but it will never be what many of us want it to be. It’s an already expensive vehicle that doesn’t justify another 10k in suspension parts to make it great. Dare I say just by a Rubicon and call it a day if that’s your desire.
100%No, just listen critically, research sources, and be sensitive to information that doesn’t seem to make sense. Same thing we should do with the internet in general and with people too.
No harm done SparkleI’m not saying the Rubicon and the culture around it is good. I’m just saying Toyota does not make a vehicle that truly does what a Jeep was designed to do. Maybe a 70 series but still not really. Again not saying Jeep is the way to go. I’ve owned 6 of them and know what they are capable of. I’m not loyal to any brand.
I don’t want to get pedantic but I’m including CVs and Axles into suspension components because they are directly linked to any changes to making a more robust off roader.
Sorry for deflecting the conversation…..carry on
@Mtn40Hmm, I want to know the part number for those beffy axels.