- Thread starter
- #21
It's not intended to (and can't) identify process improvement, at least not in short time frame. Maybe if we keep this poll alive for 10 years we will be able to see the impact of improvements.Hundreds of new LC250s are being built or sold around the world every day. Without (Six Sigma?) engineering data, would this type of survey identify if issues have been addressed (and when), or are ongoing?
BTW, 6-sigma is (almost) a scam - a great way to make money for those who provide 6-sigma training and consulting, but 80% of 6-sigma initiative fail to sustain improvements after 12 months. Most 6-sigma applications give you a short term boost, but things fall apart after 12 to 18 months. 6-sigma is good way to identify problem areas, but does not address the fundamental systemic (and organizational culture) issues required to make the improvement sustainable. Great research on the subject has been made and published by Sakya Chakravorty. If you want to learn about sustained improvement, read about "Toyota Kata" by Mike Rother from U of Michigan. I used to teach process improvement during some part of my career.
This is a great joke that illustrates 6-sigma vs. Toyota Kata approach to process improvement. Top Heavy American Management








