Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are the rails moveable on that style of OEM rack?The more things considered doing with this. The more it grows on me...
Think to leave it alone for now. It is solid.
The rails are fixed. The crossbars maybe, have not tried.Are the rails moveable on that style of OEM rack?
Doubling down on what @wpage said, not only are they fixed, they also don’t have uniform rail spacing. If one does decide to try it though, order the 5th rail.Are the rails moveable on that style of OEM rack?
The oem roof rack is still very useful, almost limitless for my use (guess for most people : RTT, storage boxes, awning, lightings, spare fuel/Rotopax, recovery boards, side molle panels, etc.) and have the authentic LC looksThe more things considered doing with this. The more it grows on me...
Think to leave it alone for now. It is solid.
This certainly is a timely thread to come across. Just spent some time yesterday trying to find handles to attach to side rail so I can get up there (I am lifted and on 35's) and using ZR Overland steps on rock rails then stepping on back tire to really get up there to tie down surfboard, which is about the extent of my rack use so far, although I might put Rotopax up there when needed.@ERROR504 & @DubDub and others have described it pretty well: ok for a very basic roof rack but prepare to start finding shortcomings if you try to do much.
First, the positives:
Then, the negatives:
- Quiet
- Looks good
- Doesn't interfere with shark fin antenna radio reception overly
Last point- I dove down the rabbit hole and have a lot of hardware that is compatible with this rack. ARB Base Rack fittings fit the crossbar edges, 10mm t-slot fittings fit the center slot (and there's a way to use FAR CHEAPER Unistrut spring nuts too!). Careful, you can spend a small fortune getting your rack right!
- 165 pound weight limit
- Useless sides and end 'structural' components
- Largely unsupported front end
- Missing rear/5th crossbar (and if installed, interferes with radio reception)
- Inconsistent crossbar spacing
- Side element top surfaces are higher than top plane of crossbars preventing things from laying flat/being fully supported when across an edge
- Design of crossbar (t-slot nut drop in hole) and left/right edges of rack (interference) virtually preclude attachment of anything on outer couple inches of crossbars
Pardon the not-so-hot pics...
View attachment 71895
View attachment 71896
View attachment 71897
I'd pay a decent amount of money to have my garage door one panel higher. Lucky...@ERROR504 & @DubDub and others have described it pretty well: ok for a very basic roof rack but prepare to start finding shortcomings if you try to do much.
First, the positives:
Then, the negatives:
- Quiet
- Looks good
- Doesn't interfere with shark fin antenna radio reception overly
Last point- I dove down the rabbit hole and have a lot of hardware that is compatible with this rack. ARB Base Rack fittings fit the crossbar edges, 10mm t-slot fittings fit the center slot (and there's a way to use FAR CHEAPER Unistrut spring nuts too!). Careful, you can spend a small fortune getting your rack right!
- 165 pound weight limit
- Useless sides and end 'structural' components
- Largely unsupported front end
- Missing rear/5th crossbar (and if installed, interferes with radio reception)
- Inconsistent crossbar spacing
- Side element top surfaces are higher than top plane of crossbars preventing things from laying flat/being fully supported when across an edge
- Design of crossbar (t-slot nut drop in hole) and left/right edges of rack (interference) virtually preclude attachment of anything on outer couple inches of crossbars
Pardon the not-so-hot pics...
View attachment 71895
View attachment 71896
View attachment 71897
@DubDub had a handle he used that I thought fit better and was bound to be cheaper (these were billet handles and overkill for a sheet metal mounted handle). I do think think the handle is functional though- I'm about 175 and I don't use it to pull myself up but as a third point of support while stepping up onto slider/door sill/tire or while "up there". Btw, RotoPax II cans are awesome and work great!This certainly is a timely thread to come across. Just spent some time yesterday trying to find handles to attach to side rail so I can get up there (I am lifted and on 35's) and using ZR Overland steps on rock rails then stepping on back tire to really get up there to tie down surfboard, which is about the extent of my rack use so far, although I might put Rotopax up there when needed.
However the side part to this rack seems flimsy and I wasn't sure if handles would work nor did I know where to attach exactly. But thanks to above photo by @Mopper it seems the Agency6 handles are working and I see how you attached. Are they sturdy? Could I really put 200 lbs of weight on those to pull myself up without bending the side rail?
As for general feeling about my OEM FE rack ; it serves my purpose so far, until this one issue. I have seen a few different ways to carry gas up there on these racks, as well as secure Max tracks, and most importantly tie surfboards down. Also not much noise in my opinion. But I will say with closer inspection there are some deceptively flimsy parts to this rack.