Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My LC250 is sitting on E-Load rated 285 70 R18 tires, has a roof rack, rock sliders, and skid plates and when I drive it in Eco mode and drive smoothly, I am still averaging 18-21 in the city and 22-24 MPGs on the flatter highways...
*Edited the MPGs achieved on the drive round trip as I used simple AVG vs calculating the actual round trip AVG and my car setup details.
Average speed? This is a key variable for a traveling brick.Ugh.
I'm here in the Front Range with my vehicle sitting about the same as you (same tires, skids, rack, sliders), and I get 16 average. No lead foot, driving in Normal, seems not to matter what I do, the mileage just sucks.
I will say my LC loves to go downhill.
Good point. Efficiency plummets over 65.Average speed? This is a key variable for a traveling brick.
Typical. Freeway driving to Moab, two weeks on a tank of gas driving around town, does not matter.Average speed? This is a key variable for a traveling brick.
Might as well be driving a GX. Oh, just a sec, the engine might seize up. Sorry, could not resist a jab at the Toyota V6 fiasco.Typical. Freeway driving to Moab, two weeks on a tank of gas driving around town, does not matter.
EDIT: Freeway driving to Santa Fe. Mostly freeway driving around here. Mixed freeway/city driving. Again, doesn't matter what I do or how I drive it, it gets 15-17 mpg.
As I quietly sit here waiting for my transmission to grenade itself before Toyota will do anything about it... uh, never mind.Might as well be driving a GX. Oh, just a sec, the engine might seize up. Sorry, could not resist a jab at the Toyota V6 fiasco.
What is the issue with transmission? I have noticed some are having problems with the auxiliary pump which energizes the clutch for starting the engine. Something else?As I quietly sit here waiting for my transmission to grenade itself before Toyota will do anything about it... uh, never mind.
[And yes, I'm starting to believe that those of us with bad transmissions also experience unusually poor fuel economy.]
What is the issue with transmission? I have noticed some are having problems with the auxiliary pump which energizes the clutch for starting the engine. Something else?
I just had a very clear illustration of this. Over the break we drove about 1400 miles from home to Savannah then up to Nashville and back. Outward averaged 22.1, cruising at 75-80. The leg to Nashville was a cold day with a strong headwind and a few more hills got 17.5 at same speed. Back from Nashville though we drove the Natchez Trace and got 27! Probably because I had the cruise control at 52 for a couple hundred miles. 50 mph limit for those not familiar and expensive national park tickets if you overdo it. For the whole trip it ended up right at 21, which seems fine to me given there was also city driving at each stop.Average speed? This is a key variable for a traveling brick.
Maybe time for a trade inβ¦plus some extra firepower when needed.Ugh.
I'm here in the Front Range with my vehicle sitting about the same as you (same tires, skids, rack, sliders), and I get 16 average. No lead foot, driving in Normal, seems not to matter what I do, the mileage just sucks.
I will say my LC loves to go downhill.
I will say my MPGs are slightly lower now⦠I get about 19-20 MPGs pretty consistently. Definitely not the same as when I had the factory OEM setup with much lower unsprung weight.Ugh.
I'm here in the Front Range with my vehicle sitting about the same as you (same tires, skids, rack, sliders), and I get 16 average. No lead foot, driving in Normal, seems not to matter what I do, the mileage just sucks.
I will say my LC loves to go downhill.
I would love to get 18-20, itβs what I expected.I will say my MPGs are slightly lower nowβ¦ I get about 19-20 MPGs pretty consistently. Definitely not the same as when I had the factory OEM setup with much lower unsprung weight.