Obviously the 57% could be concerning, but the 85% may not be. It may be how Toyota programmed the BMS. Obviously not a LC, but the newer F150 BMS only charges the battery to 80%, people have been Forscaning (a program that allows you to change settings, etc, fairly deeply) the BMS to up it to 90%.
This is an interesting thread and over my head, but I’m glad I didn’t go buy a AGM replacement, just from the information I sort of understand.
I bought a Noco G10 because of the battery conversations on this forum.
This is all new to me as well -- I'm still at the
I don't know enough to know how much I don't know phase!!
To some extent, I agree, the 85% probably isn't as concerning, because for whatever reason (either because the BMS doesn't want to fully charge the battery, or because it thinks the battery is a flooded cell) the BMS may be doing that intentionally. But that still seems like a big SOC drop from Monday morning to Tuesday morning. I don't know how much of a load the Toyota tech put on the system before he measured the SOC, but 15% seems like a lot to me.
Re the low charge that I measured this morning, to further confuse things I'll mention that I get very different SOC readings from different measuring devices. I assume that there is no specific way to measure or assess SOC -- it's more of a concept, as opposed to a standard set of specific quantitative measurements that roll up in a defined way into an overall percentage score.
I know for instance, that my battery monitor constantly broadcasts SOC and voltage, whereas with my battery tester, measuring SOC is done by running a specific test that first requires input of a battery capacity parameter (e.g. CCA), and then when you run the test it puts a load on the battery (I can see the voltage of the battery drop at the same time). Clearly, these two devices approach SOC differently. And the Toyota tech that measured my battery was using an altogether different battery tester (a fairly large "professional" one).
For SOC, I trust my battery tester more than my battery monitor (although both of them produce exactly the same results for voltage). I must admit that the 57% I reported this morning was from my battery monitor (since that is so much easier to use -- just pull up the app on my phone, as opposed to digging into the battery compartment in order to hook up and use my battery tester).
In any case, today I drove the car for a total of almost an hour and a half, and at this point, my battery tester (which I trust more) is showing an SOC of 82% (my battery monitor is showing only 68%). I assume that an hour and a half would have been long enough for the system to fully recharge the battery, assuming that it wanted to (i.e. that it doesn't automatically cut off at some pre-determined less-than-100% charge level). Or, it could be that it finished the charge phase early and moved on to float because it assumed that it was charging a flooded cell battery. Or that the charging voltage was too low. Or who knows, it could be something else altogether!
Incidentally, I don't think that my battery is defective. My battery tester has consistently showed that the overall "Health" is at 100%. I know that it looks at various measured battery parameters (such as internal resistance) to arrive at this value. The Toyota dealer also measured the health of my battery to be at 100%.
I had no idea that I'd be spending this much time trying to sort things out with a brand new car...
