Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm aware of that, do you have to time or desire to fight that out in court? I don't. But, the Antigravity does look like a fantastic option for the LC w/ the issue some members are having. I'll probably end up putting on in if I ever have the issues some members are having, but that is an expensive battery lol.I would think the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act would prevent Toyota from blaming the battery. MMWA is the reason we can safely choose to use after market parts on our cars, but still expect the warranty to be honored. A manufacturer can't just point to an after market part and refuse to cover the warranty.
I did some additional reading on the AntiGravity last night. What I found was some people were having issues with the BMS (battery management system). If the BMS fails, then the battery is junk even though the cells are still good. The warranty isn't great - 3 years with a maximum of 1 replaced battery. In addition, it sounds like you are responsible for paying to ship the battery to AntiGravity to obtain warranty replacement. If it fails again within the warranty period, you have a brick. The BMS may cause voltage spikes which could potentially damage the ECU or other electronic components. Some people also complained that getting warranty service through AntiGravity was difficult with AntiGravity denying warranty claims. Of course, I take everything with a grain of salt, this being the internet. You could get the AntiGravity and experience no issues. Or, you could get it, the BMS could destroy your ECU, and you would need both a new battery and a new ECU which Toyota may not replace under warranty. AGM batteries have some advantages over flooded lead-acid batteries, notably their resistance to vibrations, that might make an AGM a better choice than a traditional lead-acid battery.I'm aware of that, do you have to time or desire to fight that out in court? I don't. But, the Antigravity does look like a fantastic option for the LC w/ the issue some members are having. I'll probably end up putting on in if I ever have the issues some members are having, but that is an expensive battery lol.
Sorry that this is slightly off topic... I am intensely interested in my battery charge, as I do a ton of remote back-country camping, and am very concerned about running into a dead battery. (Incidentally, I carry a PAIR of NOCO jump starters, just in case!!)For full transparency I have been using/selling their batteries since 2014.
I have their lithium batteries in my Subaru BRZ’s, my Motorcycles and two in my FJ Cruiser a 60ah group 27r for starting with a RedArc BCDC charging a 120ah deepcycle house battery.
I used their battery tracker to watch and log the charging profile of my 2025 LandCruiser.
The reason the voltage increases when you disconnect the battery is because the battery has internal resistance. If the battery is connected to the car, some current will be flowing, so the internal resistance of the battery causes a decrease in the voltage between the terminals. When you disconnect the battery, the internal resistance makes no difference because no current is flowing. As a result, the voltage between the terminals will be higher.Sorry that this is slightly off topic... I am intensely interested in my battery charge, as I do a ton of remote back-country camping, and am very concerned about running into a dead battery. (Incidentally, I carry a PAIR of NOCO jump starters, just in case!!)
My question is this... I've used for many years an external battery tester, that with previous cars, I've always just connected directly to the battery to get a reading on the tester (volts, SOC, battery health, etc.). But for unknown reasons, with my '25 LC, if I just connect the tester to the battery (or the engine jump terminals), I get incorrect readings... For instance, after fully charging the battery with an external charger, my tester will show that the battery health is BAD, and the voltage is lower than I'd expect, around 12.6 volts). BUT -- if I disconnect the battery neg terminal from the car first and then test the battery, everything looks good (12.8 volts, 100% SOC, battery health 100%, etc.) And if I reconnect the negative to the battery and retest, I get erroneous results again.
I have now installed a battery monitor (directly to the battery), so that I can see the test results on my phone (connected via bluetooth). I get similar results to those of my external battery tester -- that is, although the volts appear to be correct, the SOC and health numbers appear to be off (i.e. health is bad, even tho I just recharged the battery).
Your battery monitor does not seem to have the same problems that my tester and monitor have. What exactly are you using, and where have you connected it to? THANK YOU for your help!
Yes, that's an entirely different question. I agree with you that it seems likely that the integration of the battery into the hybrid system appears to be affecting your ability to use your tester to check the state of charge of the 12 V battery.OK, thanks! BUT -- the bigger issue that I encounter with an external tester (and also with my battery monitor) is that the SOC and battery health values seem to be way off, if the battery is connected to the car while doing the test. This leads me to trying to assess my battery SOC based only on the voltage, which is iffy... (There are lots of different tables on the net showing significantly different SOCs for various voltage levels, so there appears not to be a single "correct" answer...)
For example -- after I fully charged the battery to completion (with an external NOCO charger), my tester showed a battery health of only 7%... and when I disconnected the negative terminal to the battery and retested, it showed 100% health (which is what I would have expected with a fully charged new battery). And when I reconnected the battery and then retested, the health and SOC values were way off again (in this case, SOC was 78%, and health was 62%).
I see something similar with my battery monitor (which is connected directly to my battery)... After fully recharging the battery, then giving it a couple hours to "rest", my battery monitor reported 12.88 volts and 91% SOC. Fully charged, and showing 12.88 volts, I'd of expected 100% SOC. And the next morning, it was down to 12.77 volts and 81% SOC. I believe the volts, but not the SOC...
I never had issues testing a connected battery with my previous two (non-hybrid) cars, and the instructions for my TOPDON BT-100 do not require (or even suggest) that I disconnect the battery before testing. There is something different about the LC hybrid system, vis-a-vis testing it seems... What prompted me to ask about this was that the battery monitor screen shots from the original poster showed presumably accurate (at least believable!) results for SOC...
This is the one I use. It is their gen2 of them that does agm/leadacid and lithiumSorry that this is slightly off topic... I am intensely interested in my battery charge, as I do a ton of remote back-country camping, and am very concerned about running into a dead battery. (Incidentally, I carry a PAIR of NOCO jump starters, just in case!!)
My question is this... I've used for many years an external battery tester, that with previous cars, I've always just connected directly to the battery to get a reading on the tester (volts, SOC, battery health, etc.). But for unknown reasons, with my '25 LC, if I just connect the tester to the battery (or the engine jump terminals), I get incorrect readings... For instance, after fully charging the battery with an external charger, my tester will show that the battery health is BAD, and the voltage is lower than I'd expect, around 12.6 volts). BUT -- if I disconnect the battery neg terminal from the car first and then test the battery, everything looks good (12.8 volts, 100% SOC, battery health 100%, etc.) And if I reconnect the negative to the battery and retest, I get erroneous results again.
I have now installed a battery monitor (directly to the battery), so that I can see the test results on my phone (connected via bluetooth). I get similar results to those of my external battery tester -- that is, although the volts appear to be correct, the SOC and health numbers appear to be off (i.e. health is bad, even tho I just recharged the battery).
Your battery monitor does not seem to have the same problems that my tester and monitor have. What exactly are you using, and where have you connected it to? THANK YOU for your help!
Thanks, I'll give that a try and report back.There is a small connector attached to the neg battery terminal that monitors the discharge of the 12v system to the hybrid charging system (or something like that) disconnect that connector and rerun your test.
This is what mine currently shows.
View attachment 34698
This is what mine currently shows
I unplugged the sensor (or whatever it is) from the neg side of the battery, and unfortunately, it did not make any difference re the reporting values from my battery monitor.Thanks, I'll give that a try and report back.
I added something not a true SOC but close enough for my needs while camping........ 12v outlet and a voltmeter in the jack storage area.I unplugged the sensor (or whatever it is) from the neg side of the battery, and unfortunately, it did not make any difference re the reporting values from my battery monitor.
Incidentally, I sure don't know why Toyota didn't give us a SOC display somewhere (in the dash or in the multimedia head unit) for the 12V battery. The current (old school) voltage display is pretty close to useless, as there is no way to distinguish very small (but important) differences in voltage. Maybe they were confused by their own error in the owner's manual stating that the battery charge indicator on the iForce display is for the 12 volt battery (which it isn't)...
Given your results, maybe the conclusion is that you have a defective battery?I unplugged the sensor (or whatever it is) from the neg side of the battery, and unfortunately, it did not make any difference re the reporting values from my battery monitor.
Incidentally, I sure don't know why Toyota didn't give us a SOC display somewhere (in the dash or in the multimedia head unit) for the 12V battery. The current (old school) voltage display is pretty close to useless, as there is no way to distinguish very small (but important) differences in voltage. Maybe they were confused by their own error in the owner's manual stating that the battery charge indicator on the iForce display is for the 12 volt battery (which it isn't)...