Method +35 Photo Request

@uraniumrich and @LcAz did you go with the Method 106.25 to 95.25mm Hub Rings? I'm looking to order the wheel/tire combo thru an online vendor and by default they recommend/offer Gorilla Automotive 106 to 95.1mm Hub Rings. Not sure if I should go with the Gorilla's, order the Method's or order a custom set that's the exact difference between the 703's and the LC Hub (106.25 to 95).
The hub rings must be exactly sized to be useful. I did not find a source for the 106.25 to 95.1 mm hub rings that are needed. However, the Method wheels are lug-centric, not hub-centric. In other words, while I would've like to have the hub rings, they are unnecessary to run the wheels. You can have the rings made to order, but that's a bit more expensive.
 
The hub rings must be exactly sized to be useful. I did not find a source for the 106.25 to 95.1 mm hub rings that are needed. However, the Method wheels are lug-centric, not hub-centric. In other words, while I would've like to have the hub rings, they are unnecessary to run the wheels. You can have the rings made to order, but that's a bit more expensive.
Agreed, it’s not that the wheel manufacturers somehow forgot to make hub rings that are required for a correct fitment. They will offer lug nuts that center the wheels though.
 
Method 705 18x8.5 +35 (a few lbs lighter than the 703)
Wrangler Duratrac 285/75R17
No lift

Just a liiitle poke. Looks perfect to me.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0356.png
    IMG_0356.png
    5.2 MB · Views: 143
  • IMG_0352.png
    IMG_0352.png
    5.3 MB · Views: 129
  • IMG_0353.png
    IMG_0353.png
    4.2 MB · Views: 128
  • IMG_0354.png
    IMG_0354.png
    5 MB · Views: 121
  • IMG_0355.png
    IMG_0355.png
    3.9 MB · Views: 121
  • IMG_0356.png
    IMG_0356.png
    5.2 MB · Views: 141
  • IMG_0445.png
    IMG_0445.png
    1.5 MB · Views: 154
I'm considering going with a set of Method 703 +35 offset wheels. I'm debating between those and something with a +40 or +45mm offset. If you have a set of Method wheels with a +35 offset and have a tire close in size to a 285/70R17 (11" wide), can you post photos of the amount of poke you're getting? (I'm looking to get just a slight amount of sidewall poke, without sending stripes down the side of the truck). Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3838.png
    IMG_3838.png
    415.8 KB · Views: 122
  • IMG_3842.jpeg
    IMG_3842.jpeg
    394.2 KB · Views: 124
  • IMG_3841.jpeg
    IMG_3841.jpeg
    485.7 KB · Views: 121
@uraniumrich and @LcAz did you go with the Method 106.25 to 95.25mm Hub Rings? I'm looking to order the wheel/tire combo thru an online vendor and by default they recommend/offer Gorilla Automotive 106 to 95.1mm Hub Rings. Not sure if I should go with the Gorilla's, order the Method's or order a custom set that's the exact difference between the 703's and the LC Hub (106.25 to 95).
I have a set of machined 703 with +35 offset coming in tomorrow. I ordered by calling method directly and they threw in a set of lug nuts free and they included a discount as well. Hoping to get them mounted and installed on the weekend. For tires, I am considering the Falken at4w 285/75r17 C load. I know it’s heavy, but I’ve had the at3ws before on my 05 v8 4Runner and loved them so I’m looking forwards to the at4ws.
 
I have a set of machined 703 with +35 offset coming in tomorrow. I ordered by calling method directly and they threw in a set of lug nuts free and they included a discount as well. Hoping to get them mounted and installed on the weekend. For tires, I am considering the Falken at4w 285/75r17 C load. I know it’s heavy, but I’ve had the at3ws before on my 05 v8 4Runner and loved them so I’m looking forwards to the at4ws.
It's a great tire. It is heavy that's for sure. The 285/70/18 C load AT4W is heavier than the same size tire in other brands that are E load. I heard a guy at the tire shop say that they put more into their sidewall then other manufacturers. Don't know if it's true or not but made me think about it.
 
It's a great tire. It is heavy that's for sure. The 285/70/18 C load AT4W is heavier than the same size tire in other brands that are E load. I heard a guy at the tire shop say that they put more into their sidewall then other manufacturers. Don't know if it's true or not but made me think about it.
Unfortunately… my tire shop couldn’t get the falkens =\. I made the call to go with the Toyo AT3 285/75r17 C load. Will get them mounted and installed tomorrow.
 
IMG_2285 (1).jpeg


Method 316 Titanium 17x8 | 6x5.5 | 25/5.44" Tires are Falken AT4 285/70R17 C rated, which is a true 33" tire.
 
View attachment 36286

Method 316 Titanium 17x8 | 6x5.5 | 25/5.44" Tires are Falken AT4 285/70R17 C rated, which is a true 33" tire.
Those are the 285/70s? Damn, must be the offset because that looks super burly. How do they tuck with articulation with that offset? Any hang up on fenders? That's a 65 lb. tire. Falkens are so heavy but damned if that doesn't look great.
 
Last edited:
Post some pics. Would really love to see that set up.
I literally just got back from getting them mounted, road force balanced, aligned(didn’t need it turns out specs were good), and installed. The angles are a bit skewed but it looks good imho. The factory rake is there still since it’s all stock suspension atm. The ride home was ever so slightly firmer than the 1958 stock wheels but feel more direct to the road and less spongey/springy. The tire pressure was a bit high at 40 psi and I had the old tires/wheels in the back so the ride dynamic will change since I let the pressure down to 34-35 psi. I checked to make sure that this was the “equivalent” load rating to the stock 1958 tires/pressure. I used the Toyo tire pressure charts to check this. Will report back after I get a few more miles on the ride quality since I let some air out. The tires are indeed a bit noisier than the geolandars but that was expected and I would actually say that, and I’m surprised to say this…, that the ride and overall power band has been improved and feels subjectively smoother. Fairly sure MPGs have taken a hit but I’ll have to do more driving and calculating to figure out what the damage is.

Toyo AT3 LT285/75r17 117 C load(should be around 33.8-33.9” will measure though)
Method 703 Machined 17” +35 offset
IMG_6036.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6044.jpeg
    IMG_6044.jpeg
    287.7 KB · Views: 15
  • IMG_6043.jpeg
    IMG_6043.jpeg
    322.5 KB · Views: 16
I literally just got back from getting them mounted, road force balanced, aligned(didn’t need it turns out specs were good), and installed. The angles are a bit skewed but it looks good imho. The factory rake is there still since it’s all stock suspension atm. The ride home was ever so slightly firmer than the 1958 stock wheels but feel more direct to the road and less spongey/springy. The tire pressure was a bit high at 40 psi and I had the old tires/wheels in the back so the ride dynamic will change since I let the pressure down to 34-35 psi. I checked to make sure that this was the “equivalent” load rating to the stock 1958 tires/pressure. I used the Toyo tire pressure charts to check this. Will report back after I get a few more miles on the ride quality since I let some air out. The tires are indeed a bit noisier than the geolandars but that was expected and I would actually say that, and I’m surprised to say this…, that the ride and overall power band has been improved and feels subjectively smoother. Fairly sure MPGs have taken a hit but I’ll have to do more driving and calculating to figure out what the damage is.

Toyo AT3 LT285/75r17 117 C load(should be around 33.8-33.9” will measure though)
Method 703 Machined 17” +35 offset
View attachment 36334
I have to say bro, those machined wheels look 🔥 with that color. Sweeeeet!(y) What are you going to do about spare?
 
Those are the 285/70s? Damn, must be the offset because that looks super burly. How do they tuck with articulation with that offset? Any hang up on fenders? That's a 65 lb. tire. Falkens are so heavy but damned if that doesn't look great.
The offset is only 25. There wasn't a lot of wheel choice when the vehicle was first released. The poke is about an inch, which is about the offset. I'm fine with the look but I generally don't like "poke". There are no fitment issues. I have 1000s of miles at 80 mph and dozens of hours off pavement..

I'm glad I didn't go with 35" and the necessary lift. True 33" tires on 17" rims looks big and, to me, the right size for the vehicle. Trailrecon on youtube first went with 35 and then changed back to 33.

I also like the bright wheels in the post above, especially on a light colored vehicle. My first choice wasn't Underground, but I now embrace the gangster LC variant :)
 
I have to say bro, those machined wheels look 🔥 with that color. Sweeeeet!(y) What are you going to do about spare?
Appreciate it! I’m glad that the look turned out good. I had so many crappy photoshop jobs where I was copy/pasting other people’s wheels/tires 😅. Very glad I just stuck with the machined finish and that it matches the meteor shower color well but it’s a fairly neutral look so I’m sure it would match any color vehicle.

As far as the spare goes, I’m just going to risk it and run the stock spare for now. I didn’t think it was worth trying to shove a 33.9” tire with a shiny new wheel under the trunk area. Will use it only in emergency situations anyways and will make sure to carry a set of OEM lug nuts as the extended thread aftermarket ones won’t fit.
 
The offset is only 25. There wasn't a lot of wheel choice when the vehicle was first released. The poke is about an inch, which is about the offset. I'm fine with the look but I generally don't like "poke". There are no fitment issues. I have 1000s of miles at 80 mph and dozens of hours off pavement..

I'm glad I didn't go with 35" and the necessary lift. True 33" tires on 17" rims looks big and, to me, the right size for the vehicle. Trailrecon on youtube first went with 35 and then changed back to 33.

I also like the bright wheels in the post above, especially on a light colored vehicle. My first choice wasn't Underground, but I now embrace the gangster LC variant :)
I hear you about poke. I'm kind of a geek and like the factory looking wheels with off road tires; I am going to see if the 17"x7.5" 2024 Tacoma TRD OffRoad wheel works with the 34x10.5R17 "pizza cutters". The wheels are a +55 offset; stock FE wheel is +60 so about .2 inches wider than the stock size and I like the angular looks of the wheel, I think it will work with the lines of the LC.
33s are plenty big. I rolled with those with my 4Runner and they were fine. So glad I don't have to do all the modification to have them on the LC like I had to with the 4Runner. Plus, I have no intention of lifting this rig. The articulation is phenomenal with this platform albeit the ground clearance could have been better.
I have an appointment Monday morning for the mount and balance. I had been debating going with the 285/70R17s C load but opted for the narrower tire. Hopefully, it looks like I thought it would in my head. I probably shouldn't post pics on this thread though because they aren't +35 Methods. :)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top