Let's say (for the sake of argument) that Canadian police don't like or approve of car theft. I have known some personally that would go on record as being against it. Let's take that a step further and say the courts and by logical extension the government are against it too. Hard to believe, but let's just say that is the case.
Here is the problem- two thieving bastards case out your new Land Cruiser in another stolen car. They make notes and return around 04:00 a.m. when you happen to be asleep, with the getaway vehicle standing by idling. They then bypass the manufacturer's alarm and immobilizer functions, fire that Land Cruiser up and drive away in under six minutes. Even the most diligent police officer who happens to see someone driving down the road in that vehicle at 04:15 and pulls in behind and runs the license plates has those plates come back 10-10 aka "not on file." The reason for this? The vehicle hasn't been reported stolen (yet). They follow the vehicle, see the driver obeying traffic laws and behaving in a normal fashion. That amounts to no probable cause to initiate a traffic stop, even if they pull up alongside to eyeball the thief and don't think he necessarily "fits" the vehicle. Sooner or later, the police move on to another project during their shift, and the thief parks somewhere semi public and leaves the vehicle to cool off. They come back for it a short time later after verifying there is no-one around to notice, disable GPS and drive to a pre-appointed location for payment and the Land Cruiser is then loaded into a container, locked away and destined for somewhere far away.
The most likely scenario leaves two points for police contact- during the theft/initial get away, and while parked/on route to the container. If the thieves haven't attracted any kind of attention and all of this happens in a relatively short time frame, the police, the courts and the government don't have a lot of say in the matter.
Back when Canada had its previous big peak in car theft statistics, the majority of thieves weren't organized or professional- many vehicles were stolen for joy riding or convenience, and many were stolen to commit other crimes with. Many of the people doing the car thefts weren't even old enough to drive or were drugged out and tended to attract attention when eyeballed by police on the road, even when the vehicle had not yet been reported stolen. The price of admission to car thief ranks was a screwdriver, pliers and maybe a hacksaw, a relatively low outlay that could have you driving down the road in someone else's car in a couple of minutes. The Bait Car program put a pretty big dent in that activity, especially where non-professional thieves were concerned. Early immobilizers further dented those statistics, and it took a while for thieves to catch up with technology.
Today's thieves tend to work in pairs, dress and drive in a manner that doesn't attract police attention, and spend a lot less time in a vehicle while acting in a very focused manner as they are looking to be discrete, be fast and get paid by the people organizing the thefts away from centre stage. Vehicles are stolen to order. Ring and security camera footage all over YouTube seems to back that up- they don't have the typical look of a thieving bastard to advertise while out doing their business, don't attract a lot of attention and are gone quickly with their prize. As people in Canada and the UK can attest, that can happen anywhere. The price of admission to be a car thief today? Less than $1000 worth of tech, a buddy and some online tutorials.