New LC250 Owner — Longtime 4Runner Guy Sharing First Impressions

Jul 25, 2025
5
43
CO
Vehicles
2025 Land Cruiser
I recently bought the new Land Cruiser, and after owning four 4Runners (1997, 2001, 2007, and 2017), I can confidently say this is the SUV I always wanted the 5th gen to be. It’s rugged, capable, comfortable, and family-friendly, all without feeling like a “mom car.” But when I started reading forums and Reddit threads, I was surprised by how much hate there is toward it. Coming from the 4Runner side of the Toyota world, I thought I’d chime in with my perspective.
I learned to drive in a stick shift 3rd gen and took it everywhere - camping, ski trips, you name it. That truck had real character and just felt right. The 2007 was fine, but it felt softer and more like a family car. When I bought my 2017 Off Road Premium, I expected it to be the ultimate version of what I loved. It looked great and had all the right features, but the driving experience fell short. It felt underpowered, especially in the mountains, and it never stopped hunting for gears. I also lifted it and added E rated tires, which didn’t help the ride. For my growing family, it was just too rough.

The new Land Cruiser finally feels like the truck I was looking for. It's quick enough, rides way better, and still feels like a proper body on frame Toyota. The hybrid 4 cylinder has pulled stronger than I expected and is noticeably more efficient than the old 4Runner V6. The interior layout is refreshingly simple with physical buttons and dials instead of relying on a screen for everything. It’s functional, solid, and doesn’t feel cheap like some of the recent Toyota interiors have started to.

Off road capability seems more than up to the task for my needs. Rear locker, center diff lock, sway bar disconnect, and full time 4WD. I can’t complain. Would a front locker be nice? Sure. But I haven’t run into a situation where I’ve needed one yet, and I’m guessing aftermarket support will fill that gap soon.

There’s a lot of “it’s not a real Land Cruiser” talk floating around, and I get where it’s coming from. People love the 80s and 100s for good reason. They’re iconic and built like tanks. But the 200 also sold poorly here, despite being an absolute beast. Toyota needed to pivot, and I think they hit the right balance with the 250.

Some of the common criticisms feel off base to me:
  • The hybrid powertrain is way more usable than the old V6.
  • I get the nostalgia for solid axles, but ride quality matters too. This thing still flexes well and drives much better.
  • I was skeptical about the driver assistance stuff, but you can turn most of it off, and it hasn’t gotten in my way.
  • Price wise, I think it’s fair for what you get, especially compared to what else is out there. I bought mine at MSRP and was able to negotiate a few extras.
I know not everyone’s going to love this platform, but for someone like me, a Toyota loyalist who doesn’t want to daily drive a 25 year old project truck, this is a solid move forward.

Glad to be here and excited to learn from the community. I’m hoping to get the truck out on some light trails later this year and start putting it to real use.
 
... But when I started reading forums and Reddit threads, I was surprised by how much hate there is toward it. ...
Because they are jealous ...

I see the situation with the LC 250 very similar to what happened with the FJ Cruiser. People trashed it, comparing it to the 4Runner and the Wrangler. Today, long time discontinued, it has proven itself to be a unique, extremely capable and durable vehicle that has outclassed many supposedly superior competitors, and commands better resale value than any.

The LC is NOT a 4Runner or Bronco or Wrangler or Highlander or Pilot or ... - it's a Land Cruiser. It is way more comfortable, family and road trip friendly than 4Runner, Wrangler or Bronco, without losing much of off-road capability vs. "pure" off-road vehicles. And it is way more capable than any unibody SUVs without giving away much of the comfort that these vehicles typically offer (my 2024 LC is actually more comfortable on the highway than the 2018 Highlander I used to drive, although the HL was a better city vehicle). The LC is a "do it all" vehicle, unlike the Wrangler and Bronco which are fun weekend toys, but deficient as daily driver or family vehicle. And it's perfect for an active family that likes to visit hard-to-reach places your average SUV or minivan can't.
 
Because they are jealous ...

I see the situation with the LC 250 very similar to what happened with the FJ Cruiser. People trashed it, comparing it to the 4Runner and the Wrangler. Today, long time discontinued, it has proven itself to be a unique, extremely capable and durable vehicle that has outclassed many supposedly superior competitors, and commands better resale value than any.

The LC is NOT a 4Runner or Bronco or Wrangler or Highlander or Pilot or ... - it's a Land Cruiser. It is way more comfortable, family and road trip friendly than 4Runner, Wrangler or Bronco, without losing much of off-road capability vs. "pure" off-road vehicles. And it is way more capable than any unibody SUVs without giving away much of the comfort that these vehicles typically offer (my 2024 LC is actually more comfortable on the highway than the 2018 Highlander I used to drive, although the HL was a better city vehicle). The LC is a "do it all" vehicle, unlike the Wrangler and Bronco which are fun weekend toys, but deficient as daily driver or family vehicle. And it's perfect for an active family that likes to visit hard-to-reach places your average SUV or minivan can't.
The FJ Cruiser comparison makes a lot of sense. I didn’t follow it super closely at the time, but I know it's aged really well. I can see something similar happening with the LC250 once more of them get out in the wild.

I agree with you on how it balances comfort and capability. The LC feels like the first vehicle I’ve owned that can do both really well.
 
I recently bought the new Land Cruiser, and after owning four 4Runners (1997, 2001, 2007, and 2017), I can confidently say this is the SUV I always wanted the 5th gen to be. It’s rugged, capable, comfortable, and family-friendly, all without feeling like a “mom car.” But when I started reading forums and Reddit threads, I was surprised by how much hate there is toward it. Coming from the 4Runner side of the Toyota world, I thought I’d chime in with my perspective.
I learned to drive in a stick shift 3rd gen and took it everywhere - camping, ski trips, you name it. That truck had real character and just felt right. The 2007 was fine, but it felt softer and more like a family car. When I bought my 2017 Off Road Premium, I expected it to be the ultimate version of what I loved. It looked great and had all the right features, but the driving experience fell short. It felt underpowered, especially in the mountains, and it never stopped hunting for gears. I also lifted it and added E rated tires, which didn’t help the ride. For my growing family, it was just too rough.

The new Land Cruiser finally feels like the truck I was looking for. It's quick enough, rides way better, and still feels like a proper body on frame Toyota. The hybrid 4 cylinder has pulled stronger than I expected and is noticeably more efficient than the old 4Runner V6. The interior layout is refreshingly simple with physical buttons and dials instead of relying on a screen for everything. It’s functional, solid, and doesn’t feel cheap like some of the recent Toyota interiors have started to.

Off road capability seems more than up to the task for my needs. Rear locker, center diff lock, sway bar disconnect, and full time 4WD. I can’t complain. Would a front locker be nice? Sure. But I haven’t run into a situation where I’ve needed one yet, and I’m guessing aftermarket support will fill that gap soon.

There’s a lot of “it’s not a real Land Cruiser” talk floating around, and I get where it’s coming from. People love the 80s and 100s for good reason. They’re iconic and built like tanks. But the 200 also sold poorly here, despite being an absolute beast. Toyota needed to pivot, and I think they hit the right balance with the 250.

Some of the common criticisms feel off base to me:
  • The hybrid powertrain is way more usable than the old V6.
  • I get the nostalgia for solid axles, but ride quality matters too. This thing still flexes well and drives much better.
  • I was skeptical about the driver assistance stuff, but you can turn most of it off, and it hasn’t gotten in my way.
  • Price wise, I think it’s fair for what you get, especially compared to what else is out there. I bought mine at MSRP and was able to negotiate a few extras.
I know not everyone’s going to love this platform, but for someone like me, a Toyota loyalist who doesn’t want to daily drive a 25 year old project truck, this is a solid move forward.

Glad to be here and excited to learn from the community. I’m hoping to get the truck out on some light trails later this year and start putting it to real use.
Well, I had both in the past. 2 4Runners and a 2000 model LC, 8 seater. This is hands down, better than all others
 
A lot of the hate is coming from LC200 owners because they no longer have the only modern Land Cruiser in the US. So they are drawing imaginary lines to create an exclusivity club. Some of them are probably salty about the decrease in resale value for LC200.

Oddly, some hate is also coming from the FJ owners who self-declared their vehicles to be land cruisers and now they self-declare an actual Land Cruiser to not be one.
 
There seem to be two types of negative reviewers...

1. "Professional" vehicle reviewers who may generally provide valuable insight and be entertaining to watch or listen to, but also tend to be a bit out of touch with how average folks use and value their vehicles. With these types, it's usually an inability to get past the fact that the LC 250 is not the LC 300...without considering the fact that a lot of folks may actually want a "Prado", and would prefer to hear a review based on what the LC 250 is, and not regurgitated facts about what it isn't nor ever meant to be... this becomes obvious too when so many reviewers will pan the LC 250, but then speak positively about the 6th gen 4Runner. I didn't buy my Land Cruiser 250 because it was a Land Cruiser...I bought it because I really liked this particular Land Cruiser, specifically.

2. Armchair "enthusiasts" who can't get past the fact that it doesn't have a V8, or a naturally aspirated engine...to be fair, these folks will trash every new truck in Toyota's current lineup, but the reality is that the days of huge gas-guzzler engines is fading behind us, and displacement and cylinder count is no longer the indicator of performance it used to be. I also assume these folks have never actually driven one the new Toyotas with an iForce engine.

Oddly, some hate is also coming from the FJ owners who self-declared their vehicles to be land cruisers and now they self-declare an actual Land Cruiser to not be one.
I always felt that the FJ was "North America's Prado", and came pretty close to buying one back around 2011...I ended up going with a Tacoma because it made more sense for me at the time, but always felt a bit of remorse when I'd see an FJ on the road, especially once they announced they were gonna stop making them.
 
It does seem a little like much of the LC250 vitriol comes from people trying to compare it to an FJ.

I don’t get that; it was never supposed to replace the FJ, literally or spiritually, and nobody said it was.

It was supposed to walk back the bloat of the LC200, which BTW was an excellent vehicle if maybe bigger and more upscale than a Land Cruiser was supposed to be, and re-insert it into the market in the Toyota equivalent of the slot the Lexus GX was occupying. In that sense it’s an unqualified success.

The crabbing about the powertrain is a certain subset of people who are never going to be happy with anything new. Ignore them.
 
Love the Take. Just pause for a moment and ponder how life has become so unbearable in so many ways for so many people.... because of social media. Even if there was a perfect rock crawler, offroad rugged, 25mpg, 500k miles durable, buttery daily driver, with 600 mile range for 70K....it still wouldnt be perfect enough for the all knowing eye of social media. I think the 250 hate illustrates this about as well as any recent product. It has flaws, but for most of our use cases it is remarkably good. Im confident you will enjoy this rig for many years to come.
 
2. Armchair "enthusiasts" who can't get past the fact that it doesn't have a V8, or a naturally aspirated engine...
My dad even posed this argument to me (he’s contrary by nature and will have a 180 degree opinion when I see him again in a year). It’s also a very unintelligent argument.

I just had him google the history of land cruiser engines. The number of forced induction and/or 4 or 6 cyl engines used since 1951 is prevailing. Opinions are akin to a$$holes though…
 
Last edited:
I always felt that the FJ was "North America's Prado",
Actually Toyota said it in their own literature. The Toyota FJ Cruiser web page clearly said that it was based on the Prado 150 frame albeit with a different body. During that years, the LC Prado was offered in two body styles - 2 door and 4 door. FJ Cruiser was based on the same platform, with a wheelbase that fell somewhere in between the 2 door and 4 door Prado versions. Otherwise the frame was exactly the same. Similarly to current LC 250, FJ Cruiser was offered with a unique North American powetrain based on the 1GR V6, while in the rest of the world got a 4 cylinder Prado, either diesel or gasoline (2.7 l, same as offered in entry-level 4Runner and Tacoma during that time).
 
I also came from a 4Runner TuRD, liked it - didn't love it (the constant gear hunting and more). But I've had the LC for 3 months and you can't wipe this smile off my face with a metal grinder! 😁

IMO this thing is better in every way than the 4Runner. And if gas mileage is actually a concern it can easily get 20+, the 4Runner couldn't dream of getting close to that. Every other comparison I'm with you, it's jealousy, social media, YouTubers who may or may not actually drive the thing, bias one way or another, etc. I've tuned it all out because I'm so stinkin' pleased with it. I think this may end up being the FJ, lots of hate in the beginning but the true followers will continue to grow!

LC250 FTW!
 
Great takes all around. Just drove my LC 1200 miles to Colorado with my kids. Incredibly comfortable trip for all of us. Today we hit some off road trails. Had a blast. This car is extremely capable as a people hauler or offroader. The engine is fun to drive, especially with the low end torque. And the seating position and visibility can’t be beat. Am loving this vehicle so far.
 
Honestly it’s because people always criticize Toyota BOF trucks because Toyota makes them for specific use cases that don’t fit into easy categories. Reviewers always hammered 5th Gen 4 Runners for either not being Jeep Wranglers or, conversely, not being BMWs. But actually 4 runners split the difference in a lot of key ways - you could beat them up, they always ran, and they were presentable enough that you didn’t look like a weekend warrior or a college kid. The new Land Cruiser is much the same - it’s a Goldilocks truck, pretty good at everything, not the best at any one thing, and if it runs reliably like most Japanese made Toyotas then in 15 years it will have an intense cult following. But it doesn’t compare with anything else on the market, being a nice BOF truck that is more than suitable for more off-roading than anyone but the most extreme users ever need or do. So the criticism is almost always people comparing to the wrong category and there simply isn’t one.
 
Back
Top