"forced" into buying a 4R "limited" instead of a LC?

tarcan

New member
Joined
Aug 30, 2025
Messages
5
Reaction score
12
Location
Montreal, Quebec
Vehicles
2015 FWD Rav4
Hello all, I have been reading a lot on here for the last month or so, so much information, thank you so much!

I apologize in advance for such a long first post.

I never owned a body on frame 4x4 before, never had the finances to allow it! Always drove FWD (like a few generations Rav4 and Matrix). Always been my dream to own a 4Runner. I am now in a position to acquire one, I am so excited.

I love the LC and had decided to go with a Land Cruiser non premium (don’t care for the options and prefer to get 18” wheels) instead of a 4Runner mostly based on looks and figured it was the most capable off road of the two (not interested in the part time 4wd 4runner models).

All of that until, at the last minute, I noticed the 1100 payload on the LC… Once I, my wife and two sons are inside, we pretty much take 800 pounds out of that, left with 300… I was hoping to put rock sliders (probably a 50 pounds differential once the original rails are removed I suppose). I would love to carry more than a few boxes of pop tarts on our adventurous road trips!!!!

Therefore, I decided to look further in the 4Runner, automatically excluding any of the hybrids with smaller pay loads (wow the Trailhunter around 850 pounds!). I really wanted the all-time 4WD because I live in Montreal/Quebec and we get a lot of snow. That leaves me with only the non-hybrid “limited” (in Canada, the limited does not come as a hybrid anyway). It seems the payload is 1400 pounds for that model, a gain of 300 pounds over the LC, not bad.

Once sale taxes are factored in where I live, the “limited” option is 10000$ cheaper for me (Canadian $) however, that is not so much a deciding factor as I was OK with the LC price. You could also argue that you could compare it to the “premium” package since you get real leather and some other upgrades (cannot believe that Toyota does not give the driver’s seat memory settings on a 80000+$ vehicle like the non premium LC).

On to the questions:

To get it more “up to specs” towards the LC (kind of trying to make the Ltd a little more off road capable), I would want to add complete skid plates and rock sliders (TRD front 26pounds, Transmission 12pounds, Transfer case (??50 pounds??), rock sliders 77 pounds = approx. 165 pounds?), so I would be left with about 435 pounds of payload. Does that sound about right?

My #1 reason for getting one of those is the winter driving (hence me wanting the full time 4WD). I have done as much research as I can on the different systems and I have reached where practical knowledge would really help me here. Trying to determine what exactly I am “leaving behind” as far as snow driving going from LC to 4runner Limited.
Considering the following details to try to compare them as closely as possible:

-Both would be equipped with high quality winter tires (mandatory in Quebec, thinking going with the Continental IceContact xtrm) on 18” wheels).

-I would remove that plastic air dam on the 4 runner to enhance ground clearance and approach angle

-4runner would be equipped with skid plates to protect underside against blocks of ice


Here is what I understood from my research, I would appreciate if someone could confirm I understood correctly.


Driving in mild to moderate snow:

I would presume both the 4R ltd and the LC would be “identical” here as they would both be in the regular 4WD mode and whatever regular traction aid is program would kick in as needed.


Driving in heavy snow:

Once I feel the 4R is losing grip, I would switch to 4HiL, center diff would be locked automatically and Atrac would kick in to assist in enhancing traction. With the LC, I could simply go MTS, select “heavy snow” and continue, I could decide to lock center diff if I wanted to or not. I understood that MTS is a more advanced version of Atrac, so I guess and edge for the LC.


Arriving at work and having to park on the side street: I do not have the luxury of a supplied parking spot at work. The side streets in Montreal are INSANE and often are not cleared for 6-7 days, we are talking several inches of snow that will also harden, multiple plow passing, etc. I understand these vehicles are not tanks and there are limitations, but surely it will be better than what I have right now. To get “in” with momentum, it is usually feasible and relatively easy, getting out is the tricky aspect:

With the 4R, I could put it in 4LoL and Atrac will assist (center diff is locked, so harder maneuverability). With the LC, I could put it in 4Lo, potentially try Crawl Control (even if there is no dedicated snow mode on that, but I suppose I would put it in “auto”). I would also have the extra “bonus” of being able to use 4Lo without locking the center differential and have more maneuverability (getting out of the snow banks rarely involves driving straight), alternatively, I could lock both center and rear, not sure if the front bar disconnect would ever be needed in this situation. I guess another win for the LC here.


1. Do I understand the theory behind the two systems properly?



2. In real world usage, would I see a drastic difference between the LC and the 4R ltd for my winter needs? Or we are splitting atoms on the theoretical level here?



3. Am I being worried way too much about maximum payload considering only 3-4 weeks of the year we will be out on vacation / road trip where it could be an issue? Rest of the time, it will be me alone driving around.


I apologize once more for the long post and appreciate any help or feed-back.

Thank you so much for your help.

Martin
 
I wasn't going to reply, but you seemed genuine in your asking.......

Traction is the key for driving on ice, doesn't matter how much 4WD you have, once you lose traction, you are just spinning 1, 2 or 3 tires depending on what you have locked in/turned on and Tire tread (sipes). Traction is also key on packed snow, the traction aids on the vehicle will assist, but if you don't use them properly and just spin the tires........ see point #1 above. In short you need to practice with the different settings to see what is best, dependent on the snow condition.

The LC and 4R I assume would have similar drivetrain systems. (I don't know as I'm not a 4R person).

As far as your payload worries, A gentleman told me long ago when I was trying to justify a heavy duty truck with or without 4WD to pull my boat and camper. His advice which I still follow today (40 years later) Is it a "must have" or a "want"........ I was trying to justify the extra 10K for 4WD (which I wanted) and he broke it down to what made sense............ How often do you tow your boat or trailer each year that would actually require 4WD. After a honest self-evaluation, there were only two spots that I visited maybe once each year that 4WD would be preferrable over 2WD and that was only while pulling the boat out on a steep moss covered ramp. His advice was "so it's worth 10K to pull your boat out of the water twice a year?".

My advice is along the same lines........ If that's what you want, then go for it! The quandary....... Is it worth the money along with the fuel mileage costs and comfort level for something you would take advantage of for 30 days a year. You would be the only one that can make that determination.
 
Hello all, I have been reading a lot on here for the last month or so, so much information, thank you so much!

I apologize in advance for such a long first post.

I never owned a body on frame 4x4 before, never had the finances to allow it! Always drove FWD (like a few generations Rav4 and Matrix). Always been my dream to own a 4Runner. I am now in a position to acquire one, I am so excited.

I love the LC and had decided to go with a Land Cruiser non premium (don’t care for the options and prefer to get 18” wheels) instead of a 4Runner mostly based on looks and figured it was the most capable off road of the two (not interested in the part time 4wd 4runner models).

All of that until, at the last minute, I noticed the 1100 payload on the LC… Once I, my wife and two sons are inside, we pretty much take 800 pounds out of that, left with 300… I was hoping to put rock sliders (probably a 50 pounds differential once the original rails are removed I suppose). I would love to carry more than a few boxes of pop tarts on our adventurous road trips!!!!

Therefore, I decided to look further in the 4Runner, automatically excluding any of the hybrids with smaller pay loads (wow the Trailhunter around 850 pounds!). I really wanted the all-time 4WD because I live in Montreal/Quebec and we get a lot of snow. That leaves me with only the non-hybrid “limited” (in Canada, the limited does not come as a hybrid anyway). It seems the payload is 1400 pounds for that model, a gain of 300 pounds over the LC, not bad.

Once sale taxes are factored in where I live, the “limited” option is 10000$ cheaper for me (Canadian $) however, that is not so much a deciding factor as I was OK with the LC price. You could also argue that you could compare it to the “premium” package since you get real leather and some other upgrades (cannot believe that Toyota does not give the driver’s seat memory settings on a 80000+$ vehicle like the non premium LC).

On to the questions:

To get it more “up to specs” towards the LC (kind of trying to make the Ltd a little more off road capable), I would want to add complete skid plates and rock sliders (TRD front 26pounds, Transmission 12pounds, Transfer case (??50 pounds??), rock sliders 77 pounds = approx. 165 pounds?), so I would be left with about 435 pounds of payload. Does that sound about right?

My #1 reason for getting one of those is the winter driving (hence me wanting the full time 4WD). I have done as much research as I can on the different systems and I have reached where practical knowledge would really help me here. Trying to determine what exactly I am “leaving behind” as far as snow driving going from LC to 4runner Limited.
Considering the following details to try to compare them as closely as possible:

-Both would be equipped with high quality winter tires (mandatory in Quebec, thinking going with the Continental IceContact xtrm) on 18” wheels).

-I would remove that plastic air dam on the 4 runner to enhance ground clearance and approach angle

-4runner would be equipped with skid plates to protect underside against blocks of ice


Here is what I understood from my research, I would appreciate if someone could confirm I understood correctly.


Driving in mild to moderate snow:

I would presume both the 4R ltd and the LC would be “identical” here as they would both be in the regular 4WD mode and whatever regular traction aid is program would kick in as needed.


Driving in heavy snow:

Once I feel the 4R is losing grip, I would switch to 4HiL, center diff would be locked automatically and Atrac would kick in to assist in enhancing traction. With the LC, I could simply go MTS, select “heavy snow” and continue, I could decide to lock center diff if I wanted to or not. I understood that MTS is a more advanced version of Atrac, so I guess and edge for the LC.


Arriving at work and having to park on the side street: I do not have the luxury of a supplied parking spot at work. The side streets in Montreal are INSANE and often are not cleared for 6-7 days, we are talking several inches of snow that will also harden, multiple plow passing, etc. I understand these vehicles are not tanks and there are limitations, but surely it will be better than what I have right now. To get “in” with momentum, it is usually feasible and relatively easy, getting out is the tricky aspect:

With the 4R, I could put it in 4LoL and Atrac will assist (center diff is locked, so harder maneuverability). With the LC, I could put it in 4Lo, potentially try Crawl Control (even if there is no dedicated snow mode on that, but I suppose I would put it in “auto”). I would also have the extra “bonus” of being able to use 4Lo without locking the center differential and have more maneuverability (getting out of the snow banks rarely involves driving straight), alternatively, I could lock both center and rear, not sure if the front bar disconnect would ever be needed in this situation. I guess another win for the LC here.


1. Do I understand the theory behind the two systems properly?



2. In real world usage, would I see a drastic difference between the LC and the 4R ltd for my winter needs? Or we are splitting atoms on the theoretical level here?



3. Am I being worried way too much about maximum payload considering only 3-4 weeks of the year we will be out on vacation / road trip where it could be an issue? Rest of the time, it will be me alone driving around.


I apologize once more for the long post and appreciate any help or feed-back.

Thank you so much for your help.

Martin
Lots to unpack here! I had a similar experience and ended up with an LC instead of the 6th gen 4runner.

I'll try to stay focused and answer some of your specific questions.

I had a 2025 4runner TRD reserved last March. When I went to pick it up, I wasn't super excited about the limited headroom and my wife who is 5'4" (162.5cm) really did not like the room in the backseat. We test drove a 1958 on a whim and never looked back.

1) Both the 4runner or LC with the Full-time 4wd are among the best choices for driving in the snow. You really can't wrong. Dedicated winter tires will probably play a bigger role in safety and performance if you deal with heavy snow as often as it seems you do.

2) I was under the impression that Atrac only works in 4Lo? I could be wrong, maybe someone can jump in and confirm?

3) I really wouldn't worry about the payload too much unless you really start building it out. 4-5 people loaded up for a week long ski trip with a rocket box or camping trip is very normal usage for either of these rigs. Even with skids and plates, folks are putting on 100-200lbs roof top tents without putting stiffer springs on the suspension. (I'll let someone else go into further detail regarding when the suspension may need to be upgraded).

4) And finally and most importantly, test drive them both! All of my questions and concerns melted away the second I set foot in our 1958. You may prefer the 4runner? Either way, I think the interiors are different enough that your choice will be made for you once you get inside each of them.
 
I see more payload on the 250:

IMG_4826.webp
IMG_4825.webp


The 1958 has slightly less GVWR because the load rating on the tires.

I would definitely choose a model with full-time 4WD for your use case. The LC will be a bit more off-road capable than the 4R Limited on account of the rear locker and SDM.
 
I would honestly get the lc over 4Runner. With price differential under 10k. The headroom is a real issue in the 4Runner. It height differential is about 8 inches between both trucks.
I also hear that the 4Runner drives much stiffer than the lc in all trims. Does the limited have adjustable shocks? All the reviews complain about how stiff that setup is.
 
Also gx premium here in the us is the same price as the lc non premium. It comes with 50% higher payload , 50% higher towing capabilities. 7 seats, and a huge cargo space
 
I’m confused, seeing just a 100-150 difference in payload between an LC and limited non-hybrid 4R. If payload is a deal breaker in the LC but not the 4R you have a VERY specific weight in mind…

Edit: are you looking at a 2WD 4R limited?
Edit 2: nope, that doesn’t make it make sense
 
No matter which one you choose, go for full-time 4WD. You really don't want the hassle of switching manually between 2WD and 4WD when the pavement change from dry to snow to dry as you drive around. With part-time 4WD you can't leave in 4WD all the time because you will wear out your tires and potentially can damage the 4WD when you drive on dry pavement. And then you forget to switch from 2WD when snow starts, take a curve, your rear swings out and you end up in the ditch. Driving with rear-wheel drive only in snow is not fun. So if you buy a part-time 4WD 4Runner your driving will look like that:
  • Snow on the road: manually engage 4WD
  • Dry pavement ahead: manually switch to 2WD
  • Oops, snow again: manually switch to 4WD
It's easy to forget to do this "dance" all the time.

With full-time 4WD with Torsen central differential driving in snow is a breeze. You instantly get more torque to the axle with better traction. It's convenient and safer.

As for 4Runner Limited vs. LC, give both a long test drive andhet the one you like better - in the end you will spend many hours driving it. I wouldn't worry about load capacity - LC has a plenty, unless you regularly transport tons of cement bags. From experience, the LC is more comfortable, has better ride, is quieter and overall feels more refined on highway. The 4Runner Limited will have more gizmos, but I prefer LC interior esthetics, it looks more refined, while the 4Runner interior look cheesy. 4Runner Limited doesn't have low gear (4L) which is essential if you want to do some serious off-roading. Overall, I find the LC to be a more do-it-all vehicle: it works well as a family hauler, road trip vehicle and off-road SUV. The 4Runner is more "speciallized": Limited trim is a good city and highway option but lack of 4L limits its off-road potential. Other 4Runnef trims are good off-road, but part-time 4WD is not the best option for city and highway driving in snow.
 
Also consider that the LC is much roomier than the 4R for carrying 4 people. I found the 4R to be very cramped compared to the LC.
 
Also gx premium here in the us is the same price as the lc non premium. It comes with 50% higher payload , 50% higher towing capabilities. 7 seats, and a huge cargo space
What? Are you saying a Lexus GX premium is the same price as the LC non premium? New models?
 
Correct, you compare a Base GX550 to a well appointed LC LC optioned out. V6TT v 2.4T hybrid. In Canada it will also mean Lexus dealer location as it did for me in Maine. Closest Lexus dealer 2.25hrs+ away. But esthetically it was never in the game anyway.
 
Payload limits never crossed my mind when buying any vehicle, even as a family of 5 who will sometimes pack the car to the roof with bags and gear. What happens if you go over? Handling characteristics change? Meh.
 
Also gx premium here in the us is the same price as the lc non premium. It comes with 50% higher payload , 50% higher towing capabilities. 7 seats, and a huge cargo space
The price is not even close in Canada. We really get screwed here on the GX.
 
Thank you so much everyone for taking time to reply. I think I had kind of "panicked" at the last minute as I spent so much time looking into this, was 100% certain on the LC and suddenly noticed the payload. I also never looked into this for any of my previous vehicles. But I never owned a body on frame 4x4, so I thought perhaps I really need to look into it.

I also confirm that the GX is in a different price league in Canada. I kept on scratching my head when pretty much every youtube reviewer say: get the GX for the same price, it is a no brainer! Anyhow, I much prefer the way the LC looks like if it would come down to the esthetics.

I watched the video on Driving Sport TV that compares the 4R limited with the LC and he seemed to confirm that the Atrac would kick in in 4HI L as well, just to say where I obtained that information.

Anyhow, I am reassured with my choice and LC it will be. Hoping new colors become available for 2026, I normally like to get red vehicles. I wonder how the LC would look like in Supersonic red!

Thank you again, I keep on reading here the wealth of information.

Sincerely

Martin
 
I suspect with appropriate shoes on for winter you will need to use 4 low range in the transfer case exactly zero (0) times to go anywhere you want to go at will.

You probably won’t even need to lock the center differential in 4 high. The TORSEN does a great job without any need to micromanage it on the driver’s part.

I put a set of Michelin X-Ice Snow tires on a spare set of 18”s last winter and my wife and I drove it around in plenty of snow never once needing to utilize the lockers, or even different drive modes.

If there was any downside it was reminding myself to slow down because the Land Cruiser full time 4 wheel drive system and very capable snow tires are frankly ridiculously capable.
IMG_0661.webp
IMG_0660.webp
IMG_0694.webp
 
Driving in heavy snow:

Once I feel the 4R is losing grip, I would switch to 4HiL, center diff would be locked automatically and Atrac would kick in to assist in enhancing traction. With the LC, I could simply go MTS, select “heavy snow” and continue, I could decide to lock center diff if I wanted to or not. I understood that MTS is a more advanced version of Atrac, so I guess and edge for the LC.
From my understanding, , A-TRAC is for part time 4WD Toyotas that do not have a locking rear differential. The Limited with full time 4WD does not have A-TRAC. . As you write, the LCLC trim has MTS which has a "snow" mode option, and can lock both the center and rear differentials which no 4Runner offers. I don't think the 4Runner has a version of MTS.
One advantage the Limited has over the LC that I don't think was mentioned is Adaptive Variable Suspension (AVS), giving a slight ride advantage. The GX and LX also offer this suspension.
If payload is a concern, I would definitely consider D or E range LT tires for an additional margin of safety. The stock LC tires are standard load passenger tires for good ride and MPG.
 
I don't think the 4Runner has a version of MTS.
All 3 of my 4Rs had MTS, and the 6G I had on order before choosing the LC definitely had it.
 
From my understanding, , A-TRAC is for part time 4WD Toyotas that do not have a locking rear differential. The Limited with full time 4WD does not have A-TRAC. . As you write, the LCLC trim has MTS which has a "snow" mode option, and can lock both the center and rear differentials which no 4Runner offers. I don't think the 4Runner has a version of MTS.
One advantage the Limited has over the LC that I don't think was mentioned is Adaptive Variable Suspension (AVS), giving a slight ride advantage. The GX and LX also offer this suspension.
If payload is a concern, I would definitely consider D or E range LT tires for an additional margin of safety. The stock LC tires are standard load passenger tires for good ride and MPG.

The payload number on these trucks is pretty directly related to the P metric tires, you’re 100% correct.

Not to say tossing a set of load range E tires makes it a 3/4 ton, but as you mention a set of D or E load tires would pretty easily buy another 500lbs (guesstimate) of payload.

Even at 1100lbs with 800lbs being taken up by people and 50lbs of skid plates: 250lbs of luggage and gear is a lot of stuff. I wouldn’t worry about it even with the stock tires.
 
My wife has a 2024 LC that we love and I just downsized from a 2024 Sequoia to a 2025 4Runner Off Roaf Premium iForceMax. Front wheel drive doesn’t cut it in our winters here, so I needed an SUV w either AWD or 4WD - but will do little to no real off-roading. I got an offer on a 2026 Honda Pilot Passport Trailsport Elite Blackout here in the states for just over $50k ($5k below MSRP). Toyota dealer offered me $2k off a $63k sticker price on the 4R. I ended up buying the 4R bc Toyota offered me $4k more on my trade-in. But ultimately, the loaded Trailsport w AWD would have been $11k cheaper, had way more amenities, and most importantly, a ton more room in the second row. If your family is pushing 800lbs combined, the second row of the 4R is gonna seem incredibly cramped for you guys. The LC is a bit more comfortable back there, but the leg room is not great. The horrible second row in the 4R was almost a dealbreaker for me. Toyota not pushing the rear bench back in the 4R and LC by 3-4 more inches is almost criminal given the overall size of these vehicles. I guess my point is, the LC and 4R aren’t very good family vehicles if your kids are adult sized. The payload on the Passport is only around 950lbs, but for how much less a base or even elite Trailsport is, throwing on better suspension and tires for a few grand to increase payload would probably make that a great option for you.
 
Supporting Vendors View all →
Back
Top Bottom